- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 13 Dec 2010 11:10:35 -0800
- To: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 11:04 AM, Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net> wrote: > On 13/12/2010 19:49, Anton Prowse wrote: >> On 13/12/2010 15:21, Dr. Olaf Hoffmann wrote: >>> Within CSS is is clearly incompatible with previous recommendations >>> and therefore in fact with all currently existing documents using CSS >>> with such units (whatever authors assume, how this should be presented >>> or not). >> >> Again, a valid argument which the WG must surely have taken on board. >> (For me personally, this is the strongest argument in favour of >> preserving the original units.) > > As is clear from my posts, it's also the strongest argument in favour of > adopting the /new/ units! It all depends on how many authors were using the > original units correctly as opposed to incorrectly. My point was that it's > a valid concern that authors who were using them correctly now find the rug > pulled from under them. Those authors have never truly had good physical units. I don't recall the precise details of which browsers do what, but more than one browser, at least, has done the "1in = 96px" thing for a long time. So there never was a way to do it "correctly" because the physical units never were truly physical, in practice. ~TJ
Received on Monday, 13 December 2010 19:11:28 UTC