- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2010 17:33:10 -0800
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Dec 1, 2010, at 5:27 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:25 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: >> On Dec 1, 2010, at 5:07 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Dec 1, 2010 at 5:01 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> In my view, the magic is in Tabs version, in which a keyword behave as if the author duplicated the color-stops infinitely. >>> >>> What? Where did I ever say this? I definitely don't support that. >> >> I thought you said you commented it out but could bring it back quickly if there was a strong enough use case for repeating gradients in the image. > > I was talking about the repeating-*-gradient() functions, which Moz > has implemented behind a prefix right now. Ah, I stand corrected. So, having twice as many gradient functions is preferable to just making background-repeat work better then?
Received on Thursday, 2 December 2010 01:33:56 UTC