- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:25:59 -0700
- To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Mozilla recently introduced support for a -moz-element() function, which allows you to refer to an element by id and then use it as an image. It updates live as the element changes in the DOM. This seems to be a very useful tool. Probably the greatest use is to be able to draw into a <canvas> and use that as a background for something (this is also possibly with the webkit-specified -webkit-canvas() function), but there are actually *tons* of wonderful visual effects that can be done in a much less hacky way with this. (Check out the MozHacks blogpost for cool uses - http://hacks.mozilla.org/2010/08/mozelement/ - and the MDC entry for some specifics - https://developer.mozilla.org/en/CSS/-moz-element .) While all the uses right now are element-as-image, this also finally offers the possibility of selectors on the RHS of properties. At the moment -moz-element() only accept id selectors, but one could imagine it accepting an arbitrary selector and just grabbing the first matched element, like a live version of the querySelector() function. This can then be used for other properties in the future; one use in particular that I'm interested in is being able to specify an arbitrary element as the "positioning root" for an abspos element. (This is a feature-request from some of Google's app team people, who want to do HTML popups for arbitrary elements, particularly in an editting environment where you can't sanely make the popup an abspos child of the element.) I'd like to get this added to CSS3 Values and Units (as an <element> type, or something similar), and then specified in CSS3 Image Values as an <image> type. I and Tantek volunteer to write the necessary spec text. I believe it is safe to add this to V&U right now. Given that we already have one implementation, and Webkit offers a similar ability as well, it should be quite safe to add on the verge of Last Call. If necessary, we could add it as At Risk. Thoughts? ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 31 August 2010 16:26:52 UTC