- From: Ishii Koji <kojiishi@gluesoft.co.jp>
- Date: Sun, 29 Aug 2010 07:55:26 -0400
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
> Ok, so based on your arguments I can see a use case for even/odd values > for page-break, though not really for selectors in the @page rule. I agree. The two look similar, but you're right that their usage of the terminology are different. My question applies only to page-break-before|after. I gave some thoughts on @page rules as well and can't find any issues for now. > However, I don't think even/odd is a good name for the values, because > authors can manipulate the page numbering. We could call it front/back or > verso/recto (I forget which is which), which would not imply any interaction > with page numbering. Either naming is fine with me. Word uses "page count" differently from "page number", and even/odd uses "page count" for the same reason you mentioned above. I would personally favor front/back or even/odd than verso/recto though as the latter is not in my vocabulary and thus easier to remember for me. > > There's no property to specify bindings in current CSS > > as far as I know, right? > > See http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-page/#progression I see, it's implicit, but is defined clearly. Thank you for letting me know this.
Received on Sunday, 29 August 2010 11:55:30 UTC