- From: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:43:25 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
On 24/8/10 8:41, Chris Lilley wrote: > On Tuesday, February 23, 2010, 4:29:20 AM, fantasai wrote: > > f> On 02/09/2010 03:26 PM, Chris Lilley wrote: > >>> 2) In section 3. Syntax and Parsing, the text "Note that following the >>> CSS2.1 convention, comment tokens are not shown in the rule above." is >>> given as an informative note, but appears to be normative. It states, >>> in effect, that the normative grammar given is incomplete. Please make >>> this statement normative. > > f> It's a note because the sentence above says "is given below in terms of > f> the CSS core grammar". I've clarified that to "terms and conventions". > f> Please let me know if this addresses your comment. > > Thank you, the new wording addresses that comment. > >>> 3) In section 3. Syntax and Parsing, the actual grammar for a style >>> attribute, following CSS2.1 chapter 4, appears to be > >>> declaration-list >>> : C* S* C* declaration? C* [ ';' C* S* C* declaration? C*]* C* >>> ; > >>> where C is the comment production. Is that correct? (Specifically, are >>> leading and trailing comments allowed, as well as ones between tokens?) > > f> I'll leave this question to Bert, who's our resident grammar expert. > > I haven't found any response from Bert on this. Zack is at least as much of a grammar expert as me. :-) In other words, I agree with his response. Bert -- Bert Bos ( W 3 C ) http://www.w3.org/ http://www.w3.org/people/bos W3C/ERCIM bert@w3.org 2004 Rt des Lucioles / BP 93 +33 (0)4 92 38 76 92 06902 Sophia Antipolis Cedex, France
Received on Friday, 27 August 2010 13:44:06 UTC