- From: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
- Date: Thu, 26 Aug 2010 19:18:40 +0200
- To: www-style@w3.org
- CC: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
On 26/08/2010 17:59, L. David Baron wrote: > When the root element is a block, it clearly participates in a block > formatting context, as described in CSS 2.1 section 9.4: > # Boxes in the normal flow belong to a formatting context, which > # may be block or inline, but not both simultaneously. Block boxes > # participate in a block formatting context. Indeed. This ties in with my recent musings that perhaps we don't want the root box, floats and abspos elements to be considered block-level at all (although the root element is sometimes a block container whilst floats and absposes always are). > Section 9.4.1 describes which elements establish *new* block > formatting contexts (i.e., block formatting contexts that are inside > others), but it doesn't say whether the block formatting context > that the root element participates in is established by the root > element or by something above the root element (such as the canvas). As I understand it, an element which establishes a new BFC sometimes participate in a BFC – but those two BFCs are never the same. It doesn't make much editorial sense to me that they could coincide, but I don't think it's actually important except in this particular case of the root element. > This matters because this affects whether the root element's height > is computed using the rules in section 10.6.3 or the rules in > section 10.6.7. This difference in height is detectable using > bottom-positioned background images, as reported in > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=590491 . The reporter > of that bug states that Gecko expands the root element for floats > (following the rules in 10.6.7) while Opera and WebKit do not > (following the rules in 10.6.3). Useful info, thanks. It seems that this issue needs resolution. Cheers, Anton Prowse http://dev.moonhenge.net
Received on Thursday, 26 August 2010 17:20:57 UTC