- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:30:00 -0700
- To: James Hopkins <james@idreamincode.co.uk>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
On 12/03/2009 12:04 PM, James Hopkins wrote: > The current specification is explicit in mentioning that a marker box > becomes a descendant (assuming child) of the principal box, when that > marker is positioned inside the principal box > ('list-style-position:inside'), and as such, a stacking level can be > determined. However, there is no mention of the relationship between > these elements when the marker box is positioned outside the principal > box. Has this been omitted for some specific reason? This has been filed as CSS2.1 Issue 191: http://wiki.csswg.org/spec/css2.1#issue-191 The WG resolved to make this undefined in CSS2.1, and to address in CSS3. The reason is, there are a number of other constraints on marker boxes that are more important, and we don't have implementation experience with all of them. So we want to see what stacking level is the most natural for implementations, and then spec that. So proposed to add a note to E.3 saying that "the stacking level of list-item markers is not defined." ~fantasai
Received on Tuesday, 24 August 2010 02:30:40 UTC