- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Sun, 08 Aug 2010 21:22:58 -0700
- To: Peter Moulder <peter.moulder@monash.edu>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 07/29/2010 04:16 AM, Peter Moulder wrote: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 12:16:54AM -0700, fantasai wrote: > >> | An<dfn>inline box</dfn> is one that is both inline-level and whose >> | children (if any) would participate in its containing inline formatting >> | context. For non-replaced elements, a 'display' value of 'inline' and >> | sometimes 'run-in' (when it is not creanting a block box) generates an >> | inline box. > > If this last sentence is intended to be normative (information not already > given elsewhere) then I suggest Ok, I've changed the text. > For the reasons given earlier (sometimes vs always), it's not clear whether > anonymous inline boxes are inline-level boxes or not, though my impression from > the existing text is that they aren't. [I see that Anton Prowse guesses that > they're nevertheless intended to be.] If they aren't inline-level boxes, > then the text here is quite clear that they aren't inline boxes. Whereas I > believe we want them to be at least inline boxes. Anonymous inline boxes are inline boxes, that much I think should be clear. And inline boxes are defined to be inline-level. >> | Inline-level boxes that are not inline boxes [...] >> | are called<dfn>atomic inline boxes</dfn> > ... >> (we can pick a different term, this is just what I came up with) > > It would be rather unfortunate if "atomic inline boxes" weren't in fact > inline boxes. So perhaps "atomic inline-level boxes". Good point. Fixed. >> Section 9.2.4 The 'display' property >> >> # inline-block >> # This value causes an element to generate a block box, which itself >> # is flowed as a single inline[-level] box, similar to a replaced element. >> # [...] >> >> s/generate a block/generate an inline-level block container, i.e. a block/ > > That change seems not what you intended: to me it reads as saying that it generates > a block box, and that an inline-level block container is a block box. In that case I will remove the rest of the sentence. It is mostly repeated below anyway. ~fantasai
Received on Monday, 9 August 2010 15:59:20 UTC