- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 5 Aug 2010 15:38:06 -0700
- To: www-style@gtalbot.org
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Alan Gresley <alan@css-class.com>
2010/8/3 "Gérard Talbot" <www-style@gtalbot.org>: >>> Le Lun 2 aoĹŤt 2010 16:17, Tab Atkins Jr. a ĂŠcrit : >>>> It's just computing the auto position differently, which it's allowed >>>> to do. Â (The spec only provides suggestions for how to calculate the >>>> auto position of abspos elements, and explicitly says in 10.3.7 that >>>> implementations are allowed to "guess at its probable position".) > > Tab, the same is repeated in section 10.6.4. So the same (leniency, > flexibility) applies to left: auto and top: auto. Right, auto positioning of abspos in general is only lightly "defined". >> It sucks, and we *should* tighten that up, but right now it's not >> something testable > > Then those tests should be removed. Fantasai says they shouldn't be removed, they should just be marked as not necessary for conformance. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 5 August 2010 22:38:59 UTC