- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 09:24:50 -0700
- To: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 10/05/2009 09:34 AM, Anton Prowse wrote: > Some trivial editorial issues with 9.5 (Floats):[1] > > Issue 1: > > # Since a float is not in the flow, non-positioned block boxes created > # before and after the float box flow vertically as if the float did > # not exist. > > s/non-positioned/in-flow/ > (Relatively positioned boxes are not usually removed from the flow.) Good catch. But should it be "in-flow" or "non-floating"? > Issue 2: > > # However, line boxes created next to the float are shortened to make > # room for the margin box of the float. If a shortened line box is too > # small to contain any further content, then it is shifted downward > # until either it fits or there are no more floats present. > > Delete "further" > (No prior content is referred to.) Prior content would be content before the float. > Issue 3: > > # Any content in the current line before a floated box is reflowed in > # the first available line on the other side of the float. > > When is the first available line anything other than the current line? > If never, then s/first available/same/ If the line is forced to break, then some of the content will not be placed in the current line. ~fantasai
Received on Thursday, 5 August 2010 16:58:32 UTC