- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 3 Aug 2010 11:22:53 -0700
- To: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>
- Cc: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>, divya manian <divya.manian@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Aug 3, 2010 at 10:54 AM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: > So one thing I don't understand about this proposed use of > inset shadow, illustrated at > <http://dl.dropbox.com/u/952/pola/index.html>, is why the > background-image is dimmed out at all. > > The inset shadow goes from fully opaque at the edges of the > "hole", to fully transparent over most of the hole (by some > distance related to the blur radius from the edge). So, > outside the influence of the shadow, the background-image > should be fully revealed. Why is it dimmed out? Because it's a different image. The one on the left is pola.jpg, the one on the right is pola-trans.jpg. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 3 August 2010 18:23:48 UTC