- From: Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Apr 2010 02:02:15 +0000
- To: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>, Alex Meiburg <timeroot.alex@gmail.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
> It's "outside". The solid portion of the shadow is unaffected by the blur. >~TJ I couldn't find any discussion of the direction the blur, um, spreads in the spec. It seems like it should be there. http://dev.w3.org/csswg/css3-background/#the-box-shadow # The third length is a blur radius. Negative values are not allowed. # If it is 0, the shadow is sharp, otherwise the larger the value, # the more the shadow is blurred. The exact algorithm is not specified. These are the only two references to "blur" that I see in the spec. Additional note: Can we use a word other than "sharp" in this quote? "The shadow is sharp" could easily be confused with "sharp corners". -Brian
Received on Thursday, 29 April 2010 02:04:21 UTC