- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2010 00:23:22 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, Brian Manthos <brianman@microsoft.com>, Prabs Chawla <pchawla@microsoft.com>
On Apr 27, 2010, at 11:46 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 9:36 PM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> > wrote: >> That is absolutely what I want and expect. Here, I created a visual >> aid: >> >> http://www.bradclicks.com/cssplay/spread.png > > What would be your expected rendering if the border-radius was 1px? > 0px? Do ihave to draw it? It would follow the shape, just like if you stroked the path in Adobe Illustrator with a line that is the sane color as the fill. > I don't think I like the idea of a discontinuity where sharp edges > stay sharp, but rounded edges get fatter. I don't know why you'd find that suprising. When you have a thick border, the radius on the inside of the border-radius is different from the radius on the outside. Think of this as a sort of extra border-width around the shadow shape, but with border-radius defining the inside radius of that extra borders's corners instead of the outside radius.
Received on Wednesday, 28 April 2010 07:24:03 UTC