- From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 19:30:24 +0200
- To: Sylvain Galineau <sylvaing@microsoft.com>
- Cc: Anne van Kesteren <annevk@opera.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, "Sharon Newman (COHEN)" <sharco@microsoft.com>, Daniel Libby <dlibby@microsoft.com>
Le 26/04/10 16:08, Sylvain Galineau a écrit :
> OK, my bad. So media="" is invalid but the absence of the media attribute means
> media="all". That one makes sense and seems consistent with no @media
> implying @media all {...} and @media {...} being invalid.
Just to make sure everyone knows about it: the recent WD about
xml-stylesheet says nothing at all about the lack of the 'media'
pseudo-attribute. In other terms, it's open to the xml dialect
to define that. A comment by Simon Pieters says it could be up
to the CSS OM to define that. I complained because the CSS OM
is far from ready yet and the new xml-stylesheet is supposed
to fix errors and underspecifications of the first REC. Until one
of the two specs reaches REC status, lack of 'media' pseudo-
attribute _is undefined_ even if I suspect common practice
makes it similar to |media="all"|...
</Daniel>
Received on Tuesday, 27 April 2010 17:30:56 UTC