- From: Bruno Fassino <fassino@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 08:55:15 +0200
- To: Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Anton Prowse <prowse@moonhenge.net> wrote: > > It's a little naughty of the spec to lead one into thinking that an > illegal used value for 'width' were being prescribed in 10.3.7 (and, of > course, in 10.3.3, which also didn't occur to me to look at), only to > then pull the rabbit out of the hat in 10.4 by qualifying it as > "tentative"; I would prefer a note in the introduction to 10.3 (and by > analogy, 10.6), such as the following: > > | The used value for 'width' calculated according to the rules in this > | section is tentative, being subject to the rules in 10.4. I agree that such a clarification would be useful, almost necessary, to the comprehensibility of the spec. Not only you, I'm always a bit 'uncertain' about the interpretation of the current formulation, where a previous computation is only later qualified as tentative... Regards, Bruno -- Bruno Fassino http://www.brunildo.org/test
Received on Tuesday, 27 April 2010 06:55:50 UTC