- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2010 12:41:21 -0700
- To: "L. David Baron" <dbaron@dbaron.org>
- Cc: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Thu, Apr 15, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > Separate issue! > > box-orient and box-lines appear to be part of the basic concept of > "what type of flow model is this"? As well, it doesn't look like > they'd ever be the sort of thing you might change on a box. You'll > set them alongside the display:box declaration as an atomic unit. > This suggests to me that these can be usefully combined together, and > just expressed in the display value. > > Andrew happens to do this already, with his four values for flow, > 'vertical', 'vertical-flow', 'horizontal', and 'horizontal-flow'. I'd > probably use *-wrap for the wrapping versions, but whatever. > > The only problem with this is that Flexbox has *four* values for > box-orient; two physical and two writing-mode-oriented. Are the > latter two very important? Are they, or something similar, used in > XUL currently? Additionally, how are box-direction and box-ordinal-group used in XUL? Trying to get a feel for the actual use-cases for these features. I wouldn't have come up with either of them if I was designing them on my own. ^_^
Received on Thursday, 15 April 2010 19:42:19 UTC