On Apr 12, 2010, at 6:47 PM, Brian Manthos wrote: >> If we do look at 'background-clip', then perhaps we use whichever one >> in the background that is biggest. > > <style> > H1, H2, H3 > { > border:1px; > border-radius:25%; > padding:1px; > } > H1 { > background-clip:border-box,padding-box,content-box; > } > H2 { > background-clip:padding-box,content-box; > } > H3 { > background-clip:content-box; > } > </style> > > H1 should clip to the border-box curve, H2 to the padding-box curve, and H3 to the content-box curve. That's what I'm thinking. > Given that neither padding nor border widths can be negative, it remains conveniently simple. I'm not sure I follow what you mean about the negative widths. Can you elaborate? > I don't know the answer, but it looks like something needs to change or >> be clarified. I WOULD like overflow to clip to the inner curve when >> appropriate, and to me that means also clipping the straight portions >> of the box too, to a box that aligns with those curves. > > So if "background-clip:padding-box;" was added to this example... > http://ieblog.members.winisp.net/misc/sylvain.border-radius.example2.html > > then overflow clipping should clip to the white shape in the right rendering of this image... > http://ieblog.members.winisp.net/images/sylvain_rounded_corners_2.png > > > Is my interpretation correct? That is my understanding, yes.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:45 UTC
