On Apr 12, 2010, at 11:22 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > On 04/12/2010 10:38 AM, Brad Kemper wrote: > >> >> What I'm getting at, is that this is not just an issue for >> 'border-radius', it is also for 'background-clip'. We should add >> something to ¡®background-clip¡¯ similar to what we are saying about >> border-radius: >> >> Other effects that clip to the border or padding edge (such as >> ¡®overflow¡¯ other than ¡®visible¡¯) also must clip to the box >> indicated >> by 'background-clip'. > > What if there are multiple 'background-clip' values? > > I think 'background-clip' should just affect backgrounds, not other > things like 'overflow'. 'border-radius' affects other properties > because it changes the shape of the border and padding (and content) > edges, but only affects them in that it changes that shape. Good point. So then how do you determine the "appropriate" curve for border-radius overflow clipping? The CR says it is based on 'background-clip', but you are saying that should not affect overflow. However 'border-radius' determines its clipping shape, it should work the sane if you have 'border-radius:0' (the initial value). Am I missing something here?Received on Monday, 12 April 2010 18:42:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:45 UTC