Re: [css3-color] #rrggbbaa annotation, do we need to change the process?

On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 4:44 AM, Eduard Pascual <herenvardo@gmail.com> wrote:
> A bit later than expected, but here it goes ^^
> Note that this should be properly reviewed by the WG before going
> "live": my knowledge on the processes is quite limited, and most of
> what I've included is information available from either the W3C
> website or this thread.
> Also, it's based on what *I* thought would be the stuff potential
> contributors would need/like to know, so it may be worth reviewing by
> other contributors to see if something should be added/removed.
>
> My original intent was to include all the "boilerplate" html code to
> mimic the CSS site's design; but that would have been highly
> error-prone and would have bloated the document; so I hope you have
> some kind of template you can apply to it.

I like it!  Hits a lot of relevant points and is very revealing on
many issues.  If nobody else has any issues, I'll clean it up and
format it for the site.

Thanks, Eduard!

~TJ

Received on Monday, 12 April 2010 15:23:02 UTC