- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2010 12:53:04 +0200
- To: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
- Cc: public-webapps@w3.org, www-style@w3.org
On Mar 10, 2010, at 17:57 , Daniel Glazman wrote: > 2. I don't understand why this is restricted to Widgets... > A HTML page can be dropped on a desktop or be rendered chromeless > by Mozilla Prism. A web page can be rendered in a browser in > fullscreen mode, etc. All values still make sense in the case of > a browser. > I think this spec should be made app-agnostic and Widgets should not > be the only target. I've removed all dependency on widgets. This entails that we have to change the shortname. Do we prefix it with css3-? > 3. why "maxiMIZED" and only "mini"? They are both -mized now. > 4. I think a "hidden" value makes sense for future system use of > webapps... Don't say no immediately and think more about it please. I'm still thinking about this one :) -- Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
Received on Monday, 12 April 2010 10:53:38 UTC