- From: Alberto Lepe <dev@alepe.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 21:24:16 +0900
- To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Eduard Pascual <herenvardo@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 3:32 AM, Alberto Lepe <dev@alepe.com> wrote: >> As a newcomer, I found all these comments really useful to understand >> how W3C works in general. > That means that my idea of gathering this stuff in a FAQ might indeed > be useful ^^. > I follow your idea about the FAQ. A basic "can do" and "can't do" could be enough to start with it. If you are going to move ahead with the idea and you need some help, I would be glad to help. > >> Could it be possible to divide module stages into chapter stages? This >> is, that each chapter (inside each module) could have its own >> recommendation level? > This is a midpoint between the current Modularization approach, and > the independent feature stages I suggested. > Yet still, modularization itself is a midpoint between the old > monolithic approach and more fine-grained suggestions. I'm quite > convinced the WG put serious thought and work on Modularization before > CSS3 was split into its current modules, so it seems obvious that this > approach represents the level of break-down the group considered most > optimal, keeping in mind a wide range of factors. > Actually giving a second thought, your idea of "independent feature" is better than the "per chapter" approach as any modification/addition to the standards would result in a less painful process. Thank you for all your explanations and for believing that my English is not that bad :)
Received on Friday, 9 April 2010 12:24:49 UTC