- From: Alberto Lepe <dev@alepe.com>
- Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2010 10:32:36 +0900
- To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
As a newcomer, I found all these comments really useful to understand how W3C works in general. I was amazed when I first read that in 2005 the #rrggbbaa feature was suggested and was not added because it was "out of time". I think this prove in some way that sometimes the process slows down some proposals. Could it be possible to divide module stages into chapter stages? This is, that each chapter (inside each module) could have its own recommendation level? In that way new proposals could be easily added in "WD" status (if would be a complete new chapter) or pull back only the chapter in which will be introduced. If one chapter is somehow related to other, then both chapters should be pulled back. The maturity of a module could be evaluated in terms of its chapter's maturity. If editors are too busy, then contributors could work in independent chapters and then submit it to the editor for approval. I think it could be really helpful if many of the proposal could follow a similar (but not the same) path as in Ubuntu brainstorm. Maybe as Eduard proposed, let some "contributors" to pull some ideas from the mailing list and let people to vote and comment in the W3C brainstorm site (please don't think the name is a rip-off ^.^). My feeling is that some comments can easily get lost in the mailing list if there are no follow-ups. One advantage could be that editors and WG members could just focus in those ideas with higher approval levels. Sorry if my English is not very good.
Received on Friday, 9 April 2010 01:33:09 UTC