- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2010 15:13:18 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>, Perry Smith <pedzsan@gmail.com>, "www-style@w3.org list" <www-style@w3.org>
On Apr 8, 2010, at 12:38 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: >>> If so, how does a % work? >> >> TBD. I haven't pondered it much. I was thinking multiply instead of >> add, but >> I need to consider that more. >> >>> How do colors work? How do keyword >>> properties work? >> >> I'm not sure. Maybe only lengths and numbers make sense. I'll give >> it some >> thought. > > I don't like that this uses normal CSS syntax but actually expresses > something completely different and new. Further, it means that the > same keyframe used in a transition and an animation could mean > *entirely* different things. > > I agree that this use-case is valuable, but I think we should solve it > some other way. Let's leave existing CSS syntax alone. How am I changing how CSS syntax works? Your "animation shorthand value inside a transition property value as a function argument" is much more different than my "shorthand inside a shorthand, with values similar to 'animation' values, but with differences".
Received on Thursday, 8 April 2010 22:14:04 UTC