- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 16:46:06 -0700
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Cc: Perry Smith <pedzsan@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2010 23:46:51 UTC
On Apr 7, 2010, at 2:44 PM, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 12:47 PM, Perry Smith <pedzsan@gmail.com> > wrote: >> I would like to see an additive effect so, if I have a "wobble" >> animation >> that alters left back and forth over time coupled with a transition >> that >> moves from right to left, then the result would be a wobbled >> slide. Not a >> wobble with a sudden jerk to the final position. > > I've got no problem with such a concept, there just isn't a way to do > that with keyframes right now. Well right now, there is nothing in the draft for a 'transition- triggered-animation' (or whatever we want to call it) that is part of the 'transition' shorthand. So nothing is defined for that, and we can make it work how we want. > I totally think it's *possible* to > augment keyframes to do so, though. I believe this can be done easily > enough as an extension to the current Animations draft, though, and > doesn't *need* to be specified right now. In other words, I don't > think we need to change our current design ideas to accommodate making > relative animations, or animations that can refer to both the start > and end state, in the future. Since it is not 'animation:', but rather an animation-value-like argument for a 'play()' function, we need to define how it works there. I've said how I think that should be defined.
Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2010 23:46:51 UTC