On Apr 7, 2010, at 2:07 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 11:39 AM, Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Agreed - the definition of it should be that, if a > transition-animation manipulates the property that it is attached to > the transition of (that is, if you have "transition: left 1s > play(bounce 1s);" and the bounce keyframe manipulates 'left'), the > actual transition of 'left' is overriden by the animation. I would like to see an additive effect so, if I have a "wobble" animation that alters left back and forth over time coupled with a transition that moves from right to left, then the result would be a wobbled slide. Not a wobble with a sudden jerk to the final position. I have a dumb question: in the case of left, top, right, bottom -- if the element has a position: static, then animations (and transitions for that matter) on those properties will have no effect. Is that right? Is that what we want? It would be nice if I could have an animation put the element into relative position mode, wiggle it around, and then put it back in to static position mode. PerryReceived on Wednesday, 7 April 2010 19:47:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:44 UTC