Re: T&A thoughts

On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Perry Smith <pedzsan@gmail.com> wrote:
> The current transitions and animations, to me, do not do enough.  It appears
> that the focus in on syntax and sometimes drifts into "event based" or
> "state based" discussions.  I'd like to have a clear set of objectives and
> desires.  We probably need to agree to stop at some limit or it will go on
> forever.  But I believe that we can "shove" anything we come up with into
> the existing syntax somehow.  I'd like to start with a clear list of
> objectives and a clear line that says "no... lets do that next time".  My
> belief is that after that, the list of attributes and use patterns will fall
> out.

So, could you boil down your email into such a clear list of
objectives?  I'm not sure I gather what precisely you think is wrong
with current T&A, or with the other ideas being batted about on the
list.

~TJ

Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2010 14:36:40 UTC