- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Apr 2010 07:35:45 -0700
- To: Perry Smith <pedzsan@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Wed, Apr 7, 2010 at 7:05 AM, Perry Smith <pedzsan@gmail.com> wrote: > The current transitions and animations, to me, do not do enough. It appears > that the focus in on syntax and sometimes drifts into "event based" or > "state based" discussions. I'd like to have a clear set of objectives and > desires. We probably need to agree to stop at some limit or it will go on > forever. But I believe that we can "shove" anything we come up with into > the existing syntax somehow. I'd like to start with a clear list of > objectives and a clear line that says "no... lets do that next time". My > belief is that after that, the list of attributes and use patterns will fall > out. So, could you boil down your email into such a clear list of objectives? I'm not sure I gather what precisely you think is wrong with current T&A, or with the other ideas being batted about on the list. ~TJ
Received on Wednesday, 7 April 2010 14:36:40 UTC