- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 09:15:48 -0700
- To: www-style list <www-style@w3.org>
[moving Simon's email directly to this thread, for better organization] On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 9:04 AM, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com> wrote: > Doesn't this have al the same issues as Hakon's on-enter, on-exit that have > been pointed out already? As far as I can tell, no (this probably wasn't clear in the original email you responded to, but I've hopefully stated things better here). The notion of "entry" I use is identical to the notion used in the current draft - a play-in animation runs when it first gets added to an element that doesn't already have that animation as a play-in. If there are any problems with this, then they apply equally to the current Animations draft. play-out animations are defined similarly - "exit" occurs when an element *loses* an animation. This isn't based on selectors or anything. The notion of a selector defining state still exists, but only conceptually, as is appropriate. Actual 'state' is tracked through the presence or absence of animations only. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2010 16:16:41 UTC