- From: François REMY <fremycompany_pub@yahoo.fr>
- Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 17:25:38 +0200
- To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>, "Alberto Lepe" <dev@alepe.com>
- Cc: "www-style list" <www-style@w3.org>
Agree here. W3C is slow enough as is. We don't need to make it even slower for a so small change. We could live whithout a perfect color module for Colors v3. I would prefer delaying until Colors v4. -------------------------------------------------- From: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2010 5:14 PM To: "Alberto Lepe" <dev@alepe.com> Cc: "www-style list" <www-style@w3.org> Subject: Re: [css3-color] #rrggbbaa annotation > Guys, there's no need to argue. We know that #rgba will be easy to > spec and implement, as it's a trivial parsing change. We also know > that some authors (me included) have grown to greatly prefer the hex > notation, and find it the most intuitive. > > The only thing we don't know is if it's worth pulling Colors 3 out of > Last Call to add a new feature, and letting it run through LC again > afterwards. I would personally rather let it bake as-is so we can put > it to rest, and slab #rgba into Colors 4. That won't delay its > implementation any; it's mostly a political/process thing. > > ~TJ >
Received on Tuesday, 6 April 2010 15:26:10 UTC