- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:43:55 -0700
- To: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
- CC: "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>
Hi, CSS WG-
We saw that you had decided on the property names 'image-fit' and
'image-position'. These don't make much sense in the SVG context.
We counter-propose the following options for property names, which we
think work well with the set of value keywords ('fill', 'cover', and
'contain') in both CSS and SVG:
'image-fit' -> 'fit-area', 'fit-aspect-ratio' or 'fit-resize'
'image-position' -> 'fit-position'
What do you think?
Regards-
-Doug Schepers
W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
Received on Tuesday, 29 September 2009 22:44:08 UTC