On 9/27/09 4:45 PM, Giovanni Campagna wrote: > Even if it used the anonymous box (which includes "Text" and "More > text"), the float should have been half the height of that box No, it should have had a computed height of 50% of the computed height of that box. The computed height of the anonymous box is auto, and percentages of auto compute to auto. > In any case, imo the interpretation "the box generated by the nearest > block-level ancestor element" is the correct one There are multiple boxes generated here, so "the box" is nonsensical. > the anonymous one is generated by its content. I believe in CSS each box is generated by a specific element. But I could be wrong; Bert's pointed out cases where I was wrong about box generation before. I wish it were defined somewhere outside Bert's brain. ;) >> I still think that all of 10.1 is ambiguous in any but the most trivial >> cases that fall under item 2; this is just another example.... > > Well, replacing "ancestor" with "ancestor's" may solve it, I think. Not really, no. -BorisReceived on Sunday, 27 September 2009 21:15:43 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:13:39 UTC