- From: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2009 19:58:03 -0700
- To: www-style@w3.org
Summary: - Reviewed status of Beijing Profile, 2.1 issues, and TPAC plans. ====== Full minutes below ====== Present: César Acebal Tab Atkins David Baron Bert Bos Elika Etemad Sylvain Galineau Daniel Glazman Hĺkon Wium Lie Chris Lilley Brad Kemper Steve Zilles <RRSAgent> logging to http://www.w3.org/2009/09/09-CSS-irc * bradk is only semi-here as I fulfill other commitments. Scribe: Tab Atkins Agenda ------ glazou: What to do with Beijing profile? Make note about it or drop it? glazou: Requests fantasai to write up minutes from last week. Bert: wants to discuss exactly what the containing block is for a run-in. glazou: Hakon wants to defer 2nd item (floats in multicol) until next week. <fantasai> http://www.w3.org/2009/09/02-CSS-irc -- unformatted minutes from last week <fantasai> I'll send the minutes out soon glazou: Hyatt's not around, so defer first item (gradients) until later Beijing Profile --------------- <fantasai> Beijing profile is waiting on Selectors <dbaron> I think we should continue planning to advance css-beijing on rec track fantasai: role of CSS Beijing is to describe the state of CSS at the time. fantasai: waiting on Selectors to enter CR before Beijing can enter CR. glazou: Any other opinions about what to do with it? * myakura wonders if MQ can be a part of the profile <dbaron> myakura, I think MQ should be in the next one Sylvain: who is it useful to? fantasai: it's useful to people who don't track us closely, and want to know what's useful/usable right now. fantasai: Beijing says "these are the specs we consider to be stable and active, and should be considered "part of CSS" right now" sylvaing: I've never seen anyone talking about Beijing outside of the WG. Sylvain: Who is using it? How do they find it? fantasai: Validators are using it. Our website can be confusing, but it's still a useful document. Will be more useful once we redirect css3-roadmap to point to it; that'll happen with its CR publication. Fantasai: The current work website lists all sorts of things that may not be actually useful CSS right now for authors, Beijing provides a useful service to authors. <dbaron> We could also rename it to "CSS Snapshot 2010" or whatever once we determine what the correct year is :-) glazou: As long as authors will find it useful, I'm okay with it. glazou: What do we do with the current document? Bert: It's useful as a CR. I want to point people to it. Bert: At the moment it's just a Working Draft, and causing confusion with all the other WDs we have. sylvaing: ...but if it is aimed at authors, the latter need to be able to get to it and find it easily fantasai: I can't move it to CR until Selectors moves. I'd love to move it, but selectors is blocking. fantasai: Let's deal with Selectors LC so we can move it. fantasai: I need a full week to address all LC comments and get them formatted/published glazou: Defer that, waiting on fantasai to address Selectors comments <anne> FWIW, moving the snapshot to CR is possible even if Selectors is LC <anne> The normative reference problem arises at PR, not CR, and even there you could in theory ignore it if you have good reasons. CSS2.1 Issues ------------- glazou: next item from Bert! (containing block for run-ins) Suggest send an email to www-style Bert: Sure. I can point out options, but am not sure which direction to go in. glazou: Give people a week or so to think about it on the list. glazou: Any further CSS 2.1 issues to discuss. don't think we had anything left from last week? fantasai: Don't believe anything off the top of my head is ready for discussion. TPAC / Future Agendas --------------------- glazou: TPAC - we should start collecting agenda items * fantasai will come <ChrisL> I will attend TPAC glazou: I'd like to know how many people are coming. Send attendance/regrets asap, don't forgot to book flights and hotels. glazou: CSS Variables - we need Hyatt, so let's not discuss, but at least get it minuted. glazou: Proposal from Hyatt and me in Webkit, another proposal from fantasai glazou: It's a top question from designers. I want a decision to either move forward or just drop it. glazou: it seems like we just stopped Bert: I want it dropped; haven't changed my opinion glazou: I'll drop Hyatt an email to get him in next week. glazou: That's it. Short call. See you next week.
Received on Wednesday, 23 September 2009 02:59:22 UTC