- From: Tobias Herp <Tobias.Herp@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 21 Sep 2009 22:58:03 +0200
- To: Sergey Ilinsky <castonet@yahoo.co.uk>
- CC: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>, www-style@w3.org
Sergey Ilinsky wrote: > --- On Fri, 18/9/09, Tobias Herp <tobias.herp@gmx.de> wrote: > >> Only what I wrote: >> - :textual-input to match any textual input >> (except file input if you must) >> - :button-input to match any button input (where appropriate, and >> with the possible exception of file controls) > > Isn't the pseudo-element selector a better fit for that purpose? Well... maybe: For the text or button parts of input[type="file"] (...) or any type introduced by HTML5 which will likely be composed of more than one component, :button-input and :textual-input look very much like :first-child or :first-line (or ::first-child/::first-line) and make elements accessible which could not be specified otherwise. A ::textual-input selector would keep on to be combinable to input::textual-input (and exclude textareas which would be matched by ::textual-input). On the other hand, for input[type="button"] (reset, submit), :button-input would match the entire element. I'm not sure whether it is a good idea to introduce a different syntax for "pseudo-elements"; ::before and ::after (CSS3) would be new notations for the :before and :after elements already known to CSS2.1. (Thinking about it, I consider the :: syntax a *bad* idea.) > Pseudo-classes are more often used for interaction states (at least they were in the beginning), like :hover or :focus, while pseudo-elements (using :: selector) - for "pseudo"/"shadow" content (like ::first-letter or ::before) As I understand it, "pseudo-elements" are entities which would be otherwise completely unselectable because they are not part of the element tree, like ::before or ::first-letter. In the beginning, there was no special syntax for pseudo-elements, distinguishing them from pseudo-classes. Since ... * the difference is difficult, * ::before (etc.) instead of :before would break compatibility (!), and * there is a cloudy zone in-between (e.g. for [:]:button-input), I consider it better to drop this "::" idea. > BTW, There is already a special pseudo-element defined in the CSS3-UI for the value box > ::value I couldn't find it at http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-selectors/#pseudo-elements; can you provide a link? What is a "value box"? (input[type="hidden"] has a value [but no box], input[type="submit"] can have one) -- Tobias
Received on Monday, 21 September 2009 21:05:29 UTC