On Sep 6, 2009, at 7:57 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. wrote: > On Sun, Sep 6, 2009 at 12:39 AM, Brad Kemper<brad.kemper@gmail.com> > wrote: >> Not that I am holding my breath waiting for browsers to support >> multi-layer >> file formats or anything. But it does seem like layers (or frames >> in a gif >> animation file, perhaps) would be well suited for keeping strongly >> related >> and same-size resources like this together and easily accessible >> from CSS. I >> would love to see something like this in an <image> spec, if there >> was a >> multi-layer unencumbered format that compressed as well as, say, >> PNGs. > > Of course, that's basically just using the layers as a packaging > format for the individual images, and is effectively the same thing as > just zipping them together, modulo some technical details. Good. Let's do it then, It would be much more convenient to be able to store and edit it as a single file, without having to export each layer individually with a separate file name, and then refer to a separate file name for each in CSS. That's also part of the appeal of sprites.Received on Sunday, 6 September 2009 15:23:56 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:13:39 UTC