2009-09-05 12:37, David Woolley skrev: > However, on the > principle that people who don't specify the technology are more likely > than just statistically, to be using the most common, I think the CSS > 2.1 reference and profile actually apply to the questioner and what they > are really saying is that many browsers support colour names that are > not in the standard. It seems there was a problem with validator, but > probably not the one being reported. That was a few sentences I found hard to understand. However, if you are saying that I was unaware that CSS 2.1 has very color names and did validate against the wrong profile, you are wrong. I did specifically test against the CSS 3 profile. Hence, my specific inquiry does not support your claim. -- Keryx Web (Lars Gunther) http://keryx.se/ http://twitter.com/itpastorn/ http://itpastorn.blogspot.com/Received on Saturday, 5 September 2009 20:50:03 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:13:39 UTC