- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2009 09:27:10 -0500
- To: Aryeh Gregor <Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com>
- Cc: Alex Kaminski <activewidgets@gmail.com>, Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, www-style@w3.org
On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 8:50 AM, Aryeh Gregor<Simetrical+w3c@gmail.com> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 7:10 AM, Alex Kaminski<activewidgets@gmail.com> wrote: >> The package proposal is excellent and it covers very well the basic >> usage of image sprites (to reduce the number of http requests). >> However it still does not provide much help to the developers of web >> applications and component libraries who also need an efficient method >> to address many (possibly hundreds) of image fragments. Would it be >> right thing then to target the new CSS sprites technique to this >> advanced use case (UI components), possibly using something like >> image-region property, assuming that the basic sprites case is covered >> by the new packaging proposal? > > The problems with image sprites (high memory footprint, hard to author > and maintain) would remain significant here. It seems like your use > case could be solved if CSS provided a way to algorithmically > construct URLs for background images, or something of that sort. I > don't know what a good proposal of that kind would look like, though. > Superficially, it seems kind of scary. Why can't you just use a few > hundred CSS rules? He previously mentioned size, which is relevant here. Given 200 selector blocks, at a conservative estimate of 50 characters each, and you're staring down the long end of a 10k file just for the *basic* widgeting CSS. Of course, this stuff has such regular structure that it compresses down wonderfully. I just ran a basic test which I thought would be fairly representative, generating 275 rules (11 base images * 5 states * 5 orthogonal states). The base file was 26k, but after the automatic gzipping from my webserver it's only 1.6k, a compression efficiency of over 93%. That's pretty crazy good. So, while the 'sticker shock' of the file is pretty high, the impact in practice is low. ~TJ
Received on Thursday, 3 September 2009 14:28:16 UTC