- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 08:36:24 -0400
- To: Patrick Garies <pgaries@fastmail.us>
- CC: www-style@w3.org
Patrick Garies wrote: > * I'm a bit curious why it lists the MIME type as application/x-gzip; Looks like just a mistake. I did say it's a very early draft, right? ;) > * I'm also curious if a format like *.7z would also work since it > compresses way better than ZIP does. Unfortunately, I don't know if you > can read and extract individual files from that format. I don't either, and in general the toolchain support is spottier. In particular, it involves finding a compression utility that can create .7z files on the part of the author. zip has the benefit that support is pretty much ubiquitous. > * I'm not sure how "already supported by browsers" is a "very desirable > trait". I suspect mostly in the sense that it's more slightly clear that that there aren't implementation concerns like patent problems or inability to implement in a web browser period. But I didn't write this proposal, so this is just my guess based on a 15-minute conversation with the author and the proposal itself. > Can browsers actually open ZIP files All Gecko-based browsers can, at least. > Even if so, how does that make it better than any > other format aside from decreasing implementation effort (or is this the > key trait)? That's a pretty key trait in general, yes. ;) > * Does "so you can put CSS and Javascript first in the file, and they > will unpacked and made available first" mean that these files need to > come first alphabetically via file names? Or is there a way to manually > specify order? Zip files in general just package up files in whatever order you feed them into the algorithm. For command-line zip file creation utilities it tends to be the order of the command line arguments, for example. > * Of course, there's also the million dollar question: What is the > likelihood that a browser vendor would implement such a thing? In the case of Gecko, I'd say fairly high. I can't speak to other browser vendors, obviously. I guess the really relevant question for this particular discussion is whether this is more or less likely to be implemented than sprite-related changes to CSS (whether those be changes to the processing model similar to what Bert is proposing or something else). -Boris
Received on Tuesday, 1 September 2009 12:37:11 UTC