- From: Håkon Wium Lie <howcome@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 15:46:28 +0100
- To: www-style <www-style@w3.org>, www-font <www-font@w3.org>
Prince 7.0 has been released with experimental support for OpenType font "features". This means that glyph alternates present in the font can be selected by way of CSS. Here's a sample document that uses alternates found in Adobe's "Arno Pro" font: http://www.princexml.com/howcome/2009/magic/prince7.pdf http://www.princexml.com/howcome/2009/magic/prince7.html The preliminary syntax for selecting various features is: font-variant: prince-opentype(<feature name>); Mozilla is also working on supporting font features: http://hacks.mozilla.org/2009/10/font-control-for-designers/ Their preliminary syntax is: -moz-font-feature-opentype: "<feature-name>=<value>"; (Comma-separted lists are supported in both implementations.) So, it seems font "features" could be a useful CSS feature. However, some issues have come up: - the current implementations only support arbirary features. The names of these features are buried deep down within the fonts and are hard to find. Another approach is to standardize a set of common features. There have been several such proposals in the past: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2008Jan/0380.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2009Jun/0506.html I personally think standardized names will be better, but it may still be hard to avoid cryptic names like "alt" and "salt". - Are features binary or do they need integer values? It seems that Prince has implemented features as binary switches, e.g.: font-variant: prince-opentype(salt2); while Mozilla uses integer values: -moz-font-feature-opentype: "salt=2"; Personally, I hope to avoid numbers altogeter; they seem even more arbitrary than the alt/salt/ss names we're currently seeing. - Here's a reformulated version of Mozilla's demo document that contains both the Prince and Mozilla syntax, along with Prince's rendering: http://www.princexml.com/howcome/2009/megalopolis/sample.html http://www.princexml.com/howcome/2009/megalopolis/sample.pdf http://people.mozilla.com/~jkew/feature-samples/MEgalopolis.png The page has been carefully designed so that all lines should have the same length. However, in Prince's renering, lines stick out. This is, I believe, due to Prince applying the named feature (ss05) in the case of the "Beua.." line) to all characters in the element, while Mozilla only applys it to the last character of a word. Mozilla's solution is convenient; it avoids having <span> elements around the last charater in order to give it a special feature. However, how do one decide that a certain feature should only be applied to the last characters? Does the feature itself indicate this in any way? - personal peeve: I don't like the term "font feature". The term "feature" seems much to generic to be used for a very specific feature (ouch): alternate glyphs. -h&kon Håkon Wium Lie CTO °þe®ª howcome@opera.com http://people.opera.com/howcome
Received on Monday, 26 October 2009 14:54:52 UTC