Re: [selectors] pseudo-element, component of section of simple selectors, simple selector

Brad Kemper wrote:
> 
> On Oct 22, 2009, at 8:15 AM, Daniel Glazman wrote:
> 
>> Speaking of clarification, and although that's absolutely obvious to
>> everyone here, we could also probably say in the prose that a sequence
>> of simple selectors cannot contain more than one type element selector
>> or universal selector (possibly ommitted).
> 
> Isn't that explicit in the following prose?

Yep, that's enough ; my bad I checked at the wrong place.

</Daniel>