Re: [selectors] pseudo-element, component of section of simple selectors, simple selector from Daniel Glazman on 2009-10-22 (www-style@w3.org from October 2009)

From: Daniel Glazman <daniel.glazman@disruptive-innovations.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Oct 2009 19:02:29 +0200
To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Cc: Leif Halvard Silli <xn--mlform-iua@xn--mlform-iua.no>, W3C Style List <www-style@w3.org>, Philip TAYLOR <chaa006@gmail.com>, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Message-ID: <4AE09025.2040707@disruptive-innovations.com>

Brad Kemper wrote:
> 
> On Oct 22, 2009, at 8:15 AM, Daniel Glazman wrote:
> 
>> Speaking of clarification, and although that's absolutely obvious to
>> everyone here, we could also probably say in the prose that a sequence
>> of simple selectors cannot contain more than one type element selector
>> or universal selector (possibly ommitted).
> 
> Isn't that explicit in the following prose?

Yep, that's enough ; my bad I checked at the wrong place.

</Daniel>

Received on Thursday, 22 October 2009 17:02:59 UTC