Re: Comments on gradients proposal

On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 5:14 PM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 4:57 PM, Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
>>> <angle> is from the Values Module, and has the same definition; if
>>> relevant, the angle is normalized to within the range [0,360deg).
>>
>> If it's omitted, what's the default? 0?
>
> If it's omitted, it's covered by a different paragraph (there's one
> paragraph for each of the four provided/omitted possibilities, as the
> intuitive defaults change):

ROC clarified that he's talking about radial gradients here.  I
omitted the default value for <angle> from my draft.  It should indeed
by 0deg.

~TJ