W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > October 2009

Re: Comments on gradients proposal

From: Robert O'Callahan <robert@ocallahan.org>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:57:55 +1300
Message-ID: <11e306600910201457u20b4f839jdb3ee9c0ed030e2e@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
Cc: www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Wed, Oct 21, 2009 at 2:08 AM, Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>wrote:

> Yup.  Can you suggest any way to phrase that better?  Basically the
> idea is just that the gradient-line is as long as possible while the
> perpendicular is still intersecting the box.  It may be best to
> rewrite it something like that.

I'm not sure of the best way to word that.

Another question:

> <angle> is from the Values Module, and has the same definition; if
> relevant, the angle is normalized to within the range [0,360deg).

If it's omitted, what's the default? 0?

"He was pierced for our transgressions, he was crushed for our iniquities;
the punishment that brought us peace was upon him, and by his wounds we are
healed. We all, like sheep, have gone astray, each of us has turned to his
own way; and the LORD has laid on him the iniquity of us all." [Isaiah
Received on Tuesday, 20 October 2009 21:58:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:13:40 UTC