2009/10/19 Stephen Hay <haymail@gmail.com>: > [...] > > Looking at your first template, and then your next examples, it's > obvious why template layout will be so appealing to designers. The > syntax makes it quick and clear. It's close to how designers think and > work. That's for sure. The point is: it that just syntax? That is, if had binding: url('http://example.org/template-generator?"aaa" / 5em "b@c" / auto "ddc" / 3em'); (with the appropriate script at example.org generating the XBL binding) would it have been the same? Note that the syntax is that of current css3-layout. > /Stephen > GiovanniReceived on Monday, 19 October 2009 14:56:53 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:13:40 UTC