- From: Giovanni Campagna <scampa.giovanni@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:56:20 +0200
- To: Stephen Hay <haymail@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
2009/10/19 Stephen Hay <haymail@gmail.com>:
> [...]
>
> Looking at your first template, and then your next examples, it's
> obvious why template layout will be so appealing to designers. The
> syntax makes it quick and clear. It's close to how designers think and
> work.
That's for sure. The point is: it that just syntax?
That is, if had
binding: url('http://example.org/template-generator?"aaa" / 5em "b@c"
/ auto "ddc" / 3em');
(with the appropriate script at example.org generating the XBL binding)
would it have been the same?
Note that the syntax is that of current css3-layout.
> /Stephen
>
Giovanni
Received on Monday, 19 October 2009 14:56:53 UTC