- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:41:29 -0500
- To: Stephen Hay <haymail@gmail.com>
- Cc: Www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Stephen Hay <haymail@gmail.com> wrote: > Tab Atkins Jr wrote: >> (I doubt that a general layout module would be very useful. Different >> approaches are best for solving different layout problems, especially >> when you have such a focus on simplicity of authoring as CSS. Generic >> approaches are generally substantially more complex.) > > Does this mean you see grid, flexbox and template all being > implemented and used for different things? Yes. > I see a great deal of > overlap between grid and template, because template can be used for > both grid and non-grid layout systems. Indeed. I feel that Template is really just a layer of syntax sugar over Grid, with a bit of magic sprinkled on top. As well, there are a few improvements to CSS I'd like to see that would reduce this magic to a minimum (the old flow-to proposal, or whatever we were calling it). Grid is a general mechanism that may be easier to build templating systems and such on top of, but Template is easier for authors like me to use for most common cases. > Thanks for your informative responses BTW. No problem! Layout solutions are an interesting area in CSS to me. ~TJ
Received on Sunday, 18 October 2009 17:42:21 UTC