On 10/16/09 8:15 PM, Brad Kemper wrote: > It seems like it would be a breeze to implement "::after::after", once > you have implemented single "::after" support. That depends on how ::after is implemented. Doing it with the implementation Gecko used to have until recently would have been well-nigh impossible. With the current implementation, I think it would only take changes to CSS parsing, selector matching, dynamic update handling (this would be particularly fun), and box model construction. And then whatever I've forgotten. -BorisReceived on Saturday, 17 October 2009 00:20:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Monday, 23 January 2023 02:13:40 UTC