- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@MIT.EDU>
- Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:20:19 -0400
- To: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On 10/16/09 8:15 PM, Brad Kemper wrote: > It seems like it would be a breeze to implement "::after::after", once > you have implemented single "::after" support. That depends on how ::after is implemented. Doing it with the implementation Gecko used to have until recently would have been well-nigh impossible. With the current implementation, I think it would only take changes to CSS parsing, selector matching, dynamic update handling (this would be particularly fun), and box model construction. And then whatever I've forgotten. -Boris
Received on Saturday, 17 October 2009 00:20:57 UTC