- From: Andrew Fedoniouk <news@terrainformatica.com>
- Date: Wed, 07 Oct 2009 23:19:20 -0700
- To: Bert Bos <bert@w3.org>
- CC: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
Bert Bos wrote: > On Wednesday 07 October 2009, Brad Kemper wrote: >> On Oct 6, 2009, at 10:49 AM, Bert Bos <bert@w3.org> wrote: ... > > Of course, as the support for SVG improves and spreads to more CSS > implementations, many of the images won't even be PNG, but will be > replaced by SVG images and scaling won't be a problem anymore. > If you would have SVG why do you need that strange (from SVG point of view) way of defining things like background brush named background-image and another [stroke] brush for some reason named as border-image? In CSS you just need something like background-repeat: fill | expand and single image that will be that SVG image defining your background/border layer. I mean that you will need either one: SVG or that multi-image paradise. For some reasons I do not see how SVG will play with e.g. border-image thing. So, Bert, could you elaborate on what you expect from scaling of SVG files on border-image and background-image? -- Andrew Fedoniouk. http://terrainformatica.com
Received on Thursday, 8 October 2009 06:19:56 UTC