- From: Tab Atkins Jr. <jackalmage@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 15:53:46 -0600
- To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
- Cc: robert@ocallahan.org, Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, news@terrainformatica.com, www-style <www-style@w3.org>
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:26 PM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote: > Hm, I think I'm just confused about what radial gradients are. :) > I'll have to look into that in more depth. What I described is how an > SVG image would behave but we've got something different here. Indeed. Radial gradients appear to exceed the current abilities of SVG by a goodly bit. At least, Schepers was having some real difficulties translating anything beyond the simplest examples into SVG, while he was able to achieve at least a close approximation on all the linear gradients pretty easily. > I think we should define this in gradients, at least for now. I can't > think of another existing concept of "finite size, infinite paint" > images, and it's hard to explain without a concrete example. I keep vacillating, but I think I agree. ~TJ
Received on Tuesday, 10 November 2009 21:54:38 UTC