W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-style@w3.org > November 2009

Re: radial-gradient() proposal

From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Nov 2009 14:00:00 -0800
Message-Id: <D2EB892A-FC5C-4423-AC9F-00F0989973AB@gmail.com>
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: Simon Fraser <smfr@me.com>, Brendan Kenny <bckenny@gmail.com>, www-style list <www-style@w3.org>, "Tab Atkins Jr." <jackalmage@gmail.com>
On Nov 6, 2009, at 11:07 AM, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>  

> I strongly disagree with disregarding the angle here. If I specify an
> angle, I should get that angle, not some random transformation of it
> depending on the size of the box.

So have you considered the advantages and still disagree with the  
notion of having a switch between two different modes? Or are you just  
rejecting the entire notion out of hand because you disagree that the  
default mode should be "act more like other images"?
Received on Friday, 6 November 2009 22:00:55 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 25 March 2022 10:07:40 UTC