- From: Øyvind Stenhaug <oyvinds@opera.com>
- Date: Mon, 02 Nov 2009 19:09:02 +0100
- To: "Dean Jackson" <dino@apple.com>
- Cc: "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>
On Sat, 31 Oct 2009 01:52:46 +0100, Dean Jackson <dino@apple.com> wrote: > On 24/06/2009, at 11:12 PM, Øyvind Stenhaug wrote: > I believe Safari/Minefield are doing what we intended. My suggested > change is to remove "none" from the list of allowed transform functions, > but leave the text in section 2 for now. That would make the "none > rotate(1deg)" property invalid, and match current implementations. Sounds good (as does the rest). >> 7) Section 7.2: The functions (should perhaps say "methods" to be >> consistent?) specified are "added to the Window interface", but it >> seems the DOM specs use 'AbstractView' instead of 'Window'. The HTML5 >> draft has Window, though. > > I've changed to "methods". Not sure about AbstractView v Window. Which > do you prefer? I thought it might be problematic to have to reference HTML5 which is only a draft still. If that's not an issue either one seems fine by me. Maybe Anne has an opinion (especially if this is to be moved to CSSOM). -- Øyvind Stenhaug Core Norway, Opera Software ASA
Received on Monday, 2 November 2009 18:09:47 UTC