Re: [css21] Clarification for issue 85's resolution

On Fri, 27 Mar 2009 01:39:07 +0100, Sylvain Galineau  
<> wrote:
> If the newline character's special meaning is no longer removed by the  
> backslash, how are both characters then dropped in such a way that the  
> group selector above is valid ?

I remember we decided it would be invalid and that Firefox would have to  
be changed. Per this blog post I'm correct:

Anne van Kesteren

Received on Friday, 27 March 2009 08:02:26 UTC