- From: mozer <xmlizer@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:12:53 +0100
- To: "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
2009/3/23 Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>: > Hello, > > this comment applies to css3-3d-transforms as well. > http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-css3-2d-transforms-20090320/#animation > http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-css3-3d-transforms-20090320/#animation > > > In the related section about the transformation functions it is noted, that > for the <angle> type CSS Values and Units apply: > http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-values/#angles > This notes: > "Angle values should be normalized to the range 0-360deg > by the user agent." > > 2) authors might want to have a rotation from 30deg to 750deg, > what means two complete turns and not no animation, > or maybe from 90deg to -90deg, what is different from an > animation from 90deg to 270deg (what has a > different rotation direction too). > Concerning animation I think, it is pretty useful not to > modify the given values because this results in quite > different effects as typically intended by the author, > respectively authors cannot get the intended animation > effect with only one rotation function at all. > So you might want to use the 'turn' unit for this purpose as specified in the same place ( http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-values/#angles ) Xmlizer
Received on Monday, 23 March 2009 17:13:39 UTC