- From: Brad Kemper <brad.kemper@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 19 Mar 2009 10:43:36 -0700
- To: Jonathan Snook <jonathan.snook@gmail.com>
- Cc: www-style@w3.org
On Mar 19, 2009, at 9:47 AM, Jonathan Snook wrote: >> If #a and #b are both 'display:table-cell' > > I think we'd be limiting ourselves by just adding col/row-span and > table-position to display:table-cell. Having position: absolute with > the ability to position against the grid isn't bad but because it's > out of flow, it doesn't provide much flexibility (i'd say little > advantage over what we have now). Having items positioned against > the grid, able to overlap within the grid, allowing for overflow, > while still affecting the flow of the grid, seems like a more > powerful system. > > -js Can you give an example? It seems like position:relative might be able to do that for you.
Received on Thursday, 19 March 2009 17:44:14 UTC